Racist Virus and PhFs

The F in PhF stands for fake or failure. It denotes an individual with a PhD who demonstrates anti-academic behavior, whether through corruption or stupidity.

Dr. David Hughes, who lectures on International Relations (IR) at the University of Lincoln (UK), submitted an article for peer review to Sage Journals entitled 9/11 Truth and the Silence of the IR Discipline (Feb. 27, 2020). The article questioned the silence in the IR community about the “massive body of evidence” questioning “the official narrative regarding the events of 9/11.”

A large chorus of PhDs responded to the article and proved themselves to be PhFs. I present two samples which can be regarded as typical for these failed pseudo-philosophers.

Dr Nicholas Kitchen, lecturer in International Relations at Surrey University:
”I was asked – and declined – to review it. Had I done so, I would certainly have rejected it.
/// This should never have gone out to peer review. Any serious academic … can see this is the worst kind of conspiracy theorising in only minimal academic dress.”

PhF Kitchen must be professionally stupid. A simple corrupt PhF couldn’t write such nonsense. He makes specific judgments about a paper he claims not to have read, and assumes that “any serious academic” would do the same thing.

Typical for Kitchen and similar PhFs is their lack of mentioning the ideas they claim to be criticizing; childish, sandbox name calling and insinuations with zero academic discipline. PhF Kitchen’s “serious academic” posture is as serious as a pimp’s concern for moral values.

Dr Jennifer Mustapha, an Assistant Professor in Political Science at Huron University College
”It is a steaming pile of hot garbage and I’m pretty f****g mad about it. Can reassure you that basically all of the critical IR peeps I know are as flabbergasted as me and you. It is a disgrace and not at all representative of so much of the good critical IR work out there.”

PhF Mustapha obviously knows about garbage, hot or otherwise, but academic criticism… let’s just say that she should be thankful that incompetence isn’t a criminal offense. I’m sure you noticed the total lack of substance in her rage.

Let’s now hop over to Trevor Bedford, the poster boy for the official story of the new “natural” Corona virus. A team of nine high-level researchers at the Biology Department of the Indian Institutes of Technology in Delhi published a peer-review article about four (spike-protein) inserts to COVID-19 which are unique compared to other corona viruses. The researches make the case that the inserts are similar to key structural proteins of HIV-1 and unlikely to have occurred naturally, but “probably took place through an engineered intervention by experts in microbiology.”

The American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), a third-party?, “non-profit” organization turned to Dr. Bedford to debunk the claims of the Indian researchers. Bedford’s only comment, besides promoting his own “natural development” claims, states that the research of the Indian experts “was very shoddily done,”. Congratulations Mr. Bedford, you’ve just earned your PhF. Your comment was not only stupid, and non-academic, but stinks of racism hoping your readers know nothing about the solid reputation of the Indian Institutes of Technology. Your comment is also criminal slander. I’d say, “Shame on you” if I didn’t have a very strong suspicion that you’re a shameless rent-a-professor. Your association with AAAS strengthens my suspicions because they advertise a service which pimps academic whores. “CASE (Court Appointed Scientific Experts) staff elects experts on a case-by-case basis, tailoring the search to the specific request for assistance.”

I wonder what PhF Bedford has to say about the Italian and Iranian corona viruses being of two different types (not just variations)? Let me guess, the Iranian virus speaks a shoddy Italian.

*

“Truth can’t be bullied by a fancy title.”

Dartwill Aquila

*