Democratic Child Rape

(The re-known organization now known as Stoic Autodidacts Transcending Intrinsic Rhetorical Efficiency has published a report from an unnamed official of the Dental Pixie Fond whose well documented financial support to children experiencing a loss lends high veracity to the following story.)

Mr. and Ms. Amica were given a choice between two people to rape their 12-year-old. The one candidate promised to do it properly. In democratic tradition she would allow the child to choose between a selection of procedures. She pointed out that as a woman she had good knowledge of rape. The other candidate said that he would cut through the conventional niceties and teach the child the real meaning of tough love. He would make the child a child again.

For months both candidates showered the Amicas with promises and threats of what would happen if their opponent performed the rape. The entire Amica family, siblings, cousins, aunts, uncles, grandparents and even friends and neighbors, were allowed to take part in selecting one of the two prestigious rapists. The gardeners and garbage collectors however were not included, and, if the one candidate were selected, would be sent beyond the wall of the community which would eventually be built.

The siblings tried to prevent the family from voting but were brushed aside as naive and unfamilyistic. The rest of the family argued and fought with each other over who they would vote for. The Amica house became divided in internal conflict. The child of course did get raped. Democratically.

*

“Laughter with a sharp edge can be serious.”
Dartwill Aquila

*

The West Bank is now the Judea-Samaria area.